THE COURTS VS THE FOUNDERS CONSTITUTION

No comment

THE COURTS VS THE FOUNDERS CONSTITUTION

Here we are at the Supreme Court again because our Dictator and Chief Obama has clearly violated the Constitution and the law in giving Amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, giving millions of illegal aliens work permits in violation of law, giving taxpayer benefits reserved for citizens and more.

Chief Justice Story, “How easily men justify themselves that the Constitution is exactly what they wish it to be.”

The Constitution is Supreme and means what it says. Only corrupt judges and attorneys can argue what “or vs and” means.

It appears to me that the courts are not familiar with a historical document called the Constitution of the United States.

Justice Warren reminded us, “However the Court may interpret the provisions of the Constitution, it is still the Constitution which is law and not decisions of the Court.”

Because the courts don’t follow the Constitution written and intended by our Founding Fathers, you never can predict the outcome. Including The Supreme Court, even when the law is clear.

On November 20, 2014, Obama’s administration finalized this program, the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent residents,(DAPA).

As Breitbart News reported.

• First, whether DAPA had to go through the public notice-and-comment period required by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which is the federal law that governs how federal rules and regulations are made, and would create a paper trail that the government would have to answer for in a court challenge.
• Second, even if DAPA did not have to go through notice-and-comment, whether it is still illegal under the APA because it violates a federal statute, the
Immigration and Nationality Act, which is Congress’s law for determining who can enter the United States and stay in this country.
• And third, even if DAPA does not violate the APA or other federal laws, whether it violates the president’s duty under Article II of the Constitution to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” Then the courts with a stupid argument, spent close to half of the 90 minute argument discussing whether the states have standing to bring a case in federal court.

Chief Justice John Roberts was taken back when Verrilli’s (Obamas hired liar) tried to suggest what the states could take to avoid a lawsuit with the federal government, Chief Roberts stated, “You would sue them instantly.”

The left knows this well and that is why they sue on every issue they don’t like.

We have a bunch of lawyers dressed up like Judges making decisions they have no right or authority to make. Their job is to uphold the law not give opinions on the law.

So here we are again before the U.S. Supreme Court on a very basic issue. Who gets to make law? Only one body under the Constitution under Article 1, Congress makes the laws. Period.

Where are our elected officials and their resolve to follow the Constitution and tell the Courts to pack sand? The courts DO NOT have the last say. The Constitution does. Only Congress can make law or change law. Not an unelected lawyer who disagrees. The federal courts have NO AUTHORITY to impose their opinion from the bench.

We clearly have become a lawless nation, we have ignored the principles of the Founders Constitution.

The Justices on the Supreme Court appeared to be deeply divided on President Barack Obama’s executive amnesty in violation of federal law. If the Constitution has any bearing on them, the ruling on Executive law making can only be illegal and UnConstitutional. I believe even the liberal law making Supreme Court will get this one right. Not all of them unfortunately, because some make no effort to follow their Constitutional duty and Oath of Office, But it’s very likely that the 26 states challenging Obama’s program will prevail and end the president’s huge Amnesty effort to give 5 to 6 million illegal aliens Amnesty.

This Corrupt anti-American Obama, ordered Homeland Security to not enforce the law and not to deport over 6 million illegal aliens. In addition he released over 90 thousand criminal aliens back onto the streets, who then committed thousands of violent crimes including over 123 murders, and In addition he granted them legal status in violation of the Constitution and federal law, and further issued them work permits to take American jobs and further his order provides them access to taxpayer programs as a reward for breaking our laws.

“The character of out Justices should be the objects of more constant watchfulness by all. As one said, the time is past in the history of the world when any living man or body of men can be set on a pedestal and decorated with a halo.” Hon. David J. Brewer, Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, in an address before the Marquette Club of Chicago, 1898.

How it was intended: “…the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them… The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” Thomas Jefferson

The purpose of the 3 branches of government was to keep the other in line. The legislative, the executive and the judicial and were to kept separate, this “Separation of powers” was created to provide “checks and balances” The three branches were meant to complement each other by operating within their own sphere of authority, and were never to exercise powers and prerogatives granted to the other branches.

A “living Constitution” liberal lie, is an excuse for activist judges to impose their personal preferences upon an unwilling citizenry in the name of “evolving standards,” which they alone are entitled to discern.

Samuel Adams: “If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.”

The Founders Constitution was intended to chain us down to keep us from mischief. It shows that both Federalist and Anti-Federalists believed that the exercise of judicial authority to create new legal policies,… was illegitimate and improper.